This website requires Javascript to function properly. Please go to the setting of your web browser and enable Javascript for this website.

Ad by

技多不压身，工到自然成：安省技工证书特训班，点击咨询报名！

Ad by

技多不压身，工到自然成：安省技工证书特训班，点击咨询报名！

And the Buddha says...

cca(不归的如来佛)

Thinking is the sum of brain (not spine/knee) activities -- the vast majority being free-formed, random, and casual.

思想 is the thinking that sustains.

哲学 is categorized/disciplined thinking -- it typically includes exploration, extraction, and interpretation.

宗教 is walking corp of 哲学 -- when a 哲学 runs out of steam and refuses to grow, it becomes a 宗教. In a 宗教, exploration dooms, although interpretation remains.

Note: Buddhism and Taoism alike are not religions -- rather, they are half philosophy, and half life styles.

(#6782630@0)
Last Updated: 2011-7-6
This post has been archived. It cannot be replied.

Report

Replies, comments and Discussions:

枫下拾英 / 心灵感悟 / 什么是思想，什么是哲学，什么是宗教？ -mikesmith(老猫); 2011-7-6 {280} (#6782227@0)
显然哲学和宗教都想解释这个世界的一些根本问题，比如什么是好，什么是坏，我们为什么存在，等等。哲学一般试图用reasoning,宗教一般试图用信仰。哲学一般不需要奇迹的验证，宗教归根结底要有奇迹的验证。但哲学家也可能有宗教信仰，传教士也可能用哲学的方式去说服人。这两者，都是人类思想的一部分。

写的非常好。为什么没有上精化？我替LZ抱一下不平。 -smilingfacehao(小雨妈); 07:46 (#6782223@0) reply more -mikesmith(老猫); 2011-7-6 (#6782243@0)
有点沾边但似是而非。哲学是验证思维的科学，哲学与思想显著的区别在于哲学没有批判，而思想具有排他性。哲学与宗教无关，而思想却与宗教紧密相连。世人称儒家为儒教，道家为道教，耶稣的思想为上帝的旨意等就是证明，总之，还是我的那个观点#6782221@0。。。 -noproblem(密西洒家。o O); 2011-7-6 (#6782289@0)

define "思想" - to me, it is the sum of all what human brain can think of... -mikesmith(老猫); 2011-7-6 (#6782448@0)

You've made Thinking's definition already。。。 -noproblem(密西洒家。o O); 2011-7-6 (#6782483@0)

and isn't 思想 the sum of thinking? -mikesmith(老猫); 2011-7-6 (#6782485@0)

思想=\=the sum of thinking，思想 equals valid thinking, sh*t thinking is not part of 思想。。。 -noproblem(密西洒家。o O); 2011-7-6 (#6782494@0)

that's a contradictory thinking in itself.. who defines "valid" ? will that validation process part of 思想 ? -mikesmith(老猫); 2011-7-6 (#6782516@0)

“will that validation process part of 思想“ Good question! Actually, the validation process is not part of 思想 but part of Philosophy。。。:) -noproblem(密西洒家。o O); 2011-7-6 (#6782535@0)

Very right! It is the difference of 思想 and 哲学 -snow_bird(sunshine); 2011-7-7 (#6785888@0)

思想要具备完整的体系, 无论这个体系是否有缺陷. -humormaster(李聃--乐山乐水乐美人); 2011-7-7 (#6785636@0)

大师的这番话令人刮目相看。且不论是非，但求有自己的观点和见解。赞一个。 -lifeisgoodd(life is fun); 2011-7-6 (#6782509@0)

谢赞。。。 -noproblem(密西洒家。o O); 2011-7-6 (#6782542@0)

有水平. -snow_bird(sunshine); 2011-7-7 (#6785960@0)

And the Buddha says... -cca(不归的如来佛); 2011-7-6 {553} (#6782630@0)
Thinking is the sum of brain (not spine/knee) activities -- the vast majority being free-formed, random, and casual.

思想 is the thinking that sustains.

哲学 is categorized/disciplined thinking -- it typically includes exploration, extraction, and interpretation.

宗教 is walking corp of 哲学 -- when a 哲学 runs out of steam and refuses to grow, it becomes a 宗教. In a 宗教, exploration dooms, although interpretation remains.

Note: Buddhism and Taoism alike are not religions -- rather, they are half philosophy, and half life styles.

a free-formed, random, and casual thinking is not 思想的一个组成成部分？思想一定要流长？错！思想就是你，我，古人脑子里想的。有对的思想，有错的思想，有一闪而过的思想，有哲学思想，有宗教思想。我有思想，你有思想，所有人都有思想，我的猫也有思想。 -mikesmith(老猫); 2011-7-6 (#6782765@0)

一直想问，你家有几口猫，房龄几何，思想境界如何？：）））））） -lifeisgoodd(life is fun); 2011-7-6 (#6782773@0)
老猫你所说误导人了，when you identify yourself with thoughts, thinking, you identify yourself with ego, the false "self", different thoughts bring about different egos, you vs me, them vs us, etc, 那麽什麽是真正的"我"呢，提示你下，观察你的猫 -wolke(一瓣心香--启檀); 2011-7-7 (#6784163@0)

并非误导，这世间，没有了自我，也就没有了一切。 -mikesmith(老猫); 2011-7-7 (#6784215@0)

你答的跟我和你讨论的的"思想就是你"不搭边 -wolke(一瓣心香--启檀); 2011-7-8 (#6786063@0)

论思想，我以为首先要明确是在什么意义或什么层次上来理解。比如，如果是在思维层上来理解，就是所思所想，是脑心合一的一种思维状态。如果是从理论体系来理解，思想必须要有两个功能才可以称之为思想：一是当思想形成体系后必须被广泛地所知，或所用。第二是 -statstar(tiger); 2011-7-6 {172} (#6784066@0)
第二是必须有时间的检验，有延续性，如时代影响力。

从你提出的TOPIC来看，是在理论体系层次上来论及‘思想’的。这两层意义之差别还不是能用：THINKING 和 THOUGHT所能表达清楚的。

如果这个“思想”指的是毛泽东“思想”那样的“思想”，咱们说的不是一回事。人的思想，在我贴里，指的是人的所思所想。 -mikesmith(老猫); 2011-7-7 (#6784211@0)

原来是这样，那就简单多了。本人以为初步答案：思想----所思所想。哲学-----无（国）人所学。宗教----无罪之教。 -statstar(tiger); 2011-7-7 (#6784228@0)

太提纲挈领了.有待深化. -humormaster(李聃--乐山乐水乐美人); 2011-7-7 (#6785642@0)
就所覆盖的范围而言，思想 > 哲学 > 宗教，后者只是前者的一个子集。哲学的内核本身也是一种类似宗教的情结，比如某哲学体系的创建者肯定是深信某种理论体系/规律的存在，才不遗余力的去折腾，这种信念就如同宗教信仰一样.... -see1see(Isee); 2011-7-19 (#6808293@0)

@San Diego

And the Buddha says...

Replies, comments and Discussions:

More Topics